Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Elks and Wolves

  1. #1

    Elks and Wolves

    Well it appears that these guys take Occupy seriously, methinks them a tad insecure, a good thing for people who live in a house of cards. But can you imagine how they will behave when things get 'real'? They will behave like rabid beasts.

    Wall Street Tracks ‘Wolves’ as May 1 Protests Loom

    The world’s biggest banks are working with one another and police to gather intelligence as protesters try to rejuvenate the Occupy Wall Street movement with May demonstrations, industry security consultants said.

    Among 99 protest targets in midtown Manhattan on May 1 are JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Bank of America Corp. (BAC) offices, said Marisa Holmes, a member of Occupy’s May Day planning committee. Events are scheduled for more than 115 cities, including an effort to shut down the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, where Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) investors relied on police to get past protests at their annual meeting this week.

    “Our goal is to kick off the spring offensive and go directly to where the financial elite play and plan,” she said.

    After evictions and arrests from Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park to London that began last year, the movement against income inequality and corporate abuse will regain strength, said Brian McNary, director of global risk at Pinkerton Consulting & Investigations, a subsidiary of Sweden’s Securitas AB. (SECUB) He works with international financial firms to “identify, map and track” protesters across social media and at their assemblies, he said. The companies gather data “carefully and methodically” to prevent business disruptions.

    Banks are preparing for Occupy demonstrations at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s Chicago summit on May 20 and 21 by sharing information from video surveillance, robots and officers in buildings, giving “a real-time, 360-degree” view, said McNary, who works on the project.

    Elk Versus Wolves

    Banks cooperating on surveillance are like elk fending off wolves in Yellowstone National Park, he said. While other animals try in vain to sprint away alone, elk survive attacks by forming a ring together, he said.

    Planning for May 1 in New York began in January in a fourth-floor workspace at 16 Beaver St., about two blocks from Wall Street, according to Holmes. The date serves as an international labor day, commemorating a deadly 1886 clash between police and workers in Chicago’s Haymarket Square.

    The midtown demonstrations will take place from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m., followed by a march from Bryant Park to Union Square and a 4 p.m. rally there, according to an online schedule. Protesters, including labor unions and community groups, have a permit to march from Union Square to lower Manhattan, according to police. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS)’s headquarters is among financial- district picketing options, Holmes said.

    Atrium Closed

    Banks are bracing. Deutsche Bank AG (DBK) is closing the public atrium of its U.S. headquarters at 60 Wall St., which protesters have used for meetings, Holmes said. Duncan King, a bank spokesman, declined to comment.

    New York police can handle picketers, said Paul Browne, a spokesman. “We’re experienced at accommodating lawful protests and responding appropriately to anyone who engages in unlawful activity,” he said. “We’re prepared to do both next month.”

    Banks have a history of coordinating security with city authorities. At a 2009 U.S. Senate hearing, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly described a partnership with financial-district firms that gives his department “access to hundreds of private- security cameras.” Footage is monitored in a downtown Manhattan center, he said. A 2005 letter Kelly wrote to Edward Forst, then chief administrative officer at Goldman Sachs, shows it was among firms getting space in the facility.

    ‘Fire’ Rekindling

    Starting in 2010, JPMorgan gave the New York City Police Foundation the largest donation in the group’s history, the bank’s website shows. The gift, valued at $4.6 million, included 1,000 patrol car laptops. “These officers put their lives on the line every day to keep us safe,” Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon, 56, said in a statement on the website.

    New York companies have provided services and equipment for decades and are proud to show their support, Browne said. The foundation is the department’s fundraising arm. Goldman Sachs, News Corp. and Barclays Plc (BARC) were among 16 donors who gave at least $100,000 through the year ended June 30, 2010, according to the foundation’s website. Dozens of others gave less.

    Last year’s anti-bank protests were “like a big forest fire that was suppressed and put out,” Chris Swecker, the former head of security at Bank of America, said in an interview. Firms are studying protesters because “there’s also the opportunity for spontaneous fires to spring back up again,” said Swecker, who runs a security-consulting firm in Charlotte, North Carolina.

    Private-security teams in London have become an “incredible army” and “the eyes and ears of the city” thanks to a coordination program called Project Griffin, according to Rachel Briggs, policy director at the London-based Institute for Strategic Dialogue. The organization develops responses to security challenges.

    ‘Show of Strength’

    The heads of security of most of the major banks there have formed a group called “sister banks,” said Ian Mansfield, a London police counterterrorism security adviser. They do more than gather and share information with one another and the police, he said by e-mail. “Sometimes we will ask for a high- visibility deployment around premises basically as a ‘show of strength,’” he wrote.

    Spokesmen for Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citigroup Inc. (C), Morgan Stanley (MS), UBS AG (UBSN) and Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGN) wouldn’t describe security measures for the protests. One likened commenting to telling al-Qaeda about the bank’s continuity plans.

    “When you portray a position of weakness, it invites attack,” said McNary, the Pinkerton director. “They don’t want to provide the perception that they’re hunkering down behind their bulwarks and putting up big walls.”

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...ests-loom.html

  2. #2

  3. #3
    "We are not the Bolsheviks, yet." That "yet" is pretty sweet, but what the hell is the hold up...
    "The present status of society is but the result of the struggle of humankind during this and preceding periods - yes, struggle! "You cannot reform society by the sprinkling of rose oil" said Mirabeau, and history proves the correctness of this statement. In no age did the rulers and despoilers of our race relinquish their hold upon the throat of their victims, unless forced to - by logic and argument? No...Blood, the precious sap was ever the price of liberty." August Spies, 1886

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Dhalgren View Post
    "We are not the Bolsheviks, yet." That "yet" is pretty sweet, but what the hell is the hold up...
    I'm not quite sure what to make of it. Mebbe it's like a child threatening to hold his breath until he turns Red.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by blindpig View Post
    I'm not quite sure what to make of it. Mebbe it's like a child threatening to hold his breath until he turns Red.
    Yeah, I think it is both a "threat" and a supplication - "Look, we ain't no stinkin' commies! We're just good little workers who want to eat and stuff. Can't you treat us better?" I wonder how long that will endure. I was watching some of those clips from Eisentein's The Strike! that Nikos posted. And I was struck (again) by how reasonable strikers demands were and are; and how un-bloody-reasonable the Owners were and are. We are at the mercy of these rich pustules and they have no mercy. Workers sweat bullets every day that their jobs will be there tomorrow, we buy into the 'pie in the sky' promises of the Owners that if we just hang on, if we just put up with deprivation just a little more, if we will take cuts in social programs, if we do with less and work longer and harder for the same wage and worse conditions, if we will just continue to trust that capitalism is the only thing that will work; well, if we do all that and much more, the Owners will let us work for them and create their wealth and when we are too old to do anything else they will let us die in peace (in poverty, but peace). What a fucking deal!
    "The present status of society is but the result of the struggle of humankind during this and preceding periods - yes, struggle! "You cannot reform society by the sprinkling of rose oil" said Mirabeau, and history proves the correctness of this statement. In no age did the rulers and despoilers of our race relinquish their hold upon the throat of their victims, unless forced to - by logic and argument? No...Blood, the precious sap was ever the price of liberty." August Spies, 1886

  6. #6
    Senior Member anaxarchos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Hurricane Alley
    Posts
    5,323
    Quote Originally Posted by blindpig View Post
    Ain't Mensheviks yet, either...
    Or Social Revolutionaries (Left or Right)...
    Or Black Redistribution...
    Or Emancipation of Labor...
    Or People's Will...
    Or Narodniks...
    Or Nihilists...
    Or, even Decembrists.

    Just ordinary house slaves making idle threats...
    Fuck you, junior.

    Happy May Day, BTW.

  7. #7
    Already an existential crisis among the fleas of mice:

    http://www.progressive.org/rebrand_o...e+Main+Feed%29

    After the dross is burned off will there be anything left?
    Last edited by blindpig; 05-02-2012 at 09:30 AM.

  8. #8
    But the real story is how the main groups behind the 99% Spring – such as MoveOn and Rebuild the Dream – have created a meta-brand known as the “99% Movement” that encompasses a product line that includes 99% Power, 99% Candidates, 99% Uniting, a 99% Voter Pledge, and events like “All in for the 99%” and “99% Spring Bank Protests.”
    Broadening the coalition to include radical left organizations that reject electoral politics is a sophisticated way to enhance the overall brand. Such groups can feel confident they are maintaining their independence from elections by participating in the 99% Spring but they are still building the 99% brand, which will then be used in forms like the 99% voter pledge and 99% candidates to boost the Democratic Party’s fortunes come fall.
    (My bolding)

    With the 99% Spring kicking into full gear, with the help of MoveOn’s PR firm, BerlinRosen, the 99% Movement brand is suddenly appearing everywhere. MoveOn is promoting weeks of protests at upcoming corporate shareholder meetings.
    A PR firm was all they really needed.

    Van Jones has been leading this push to rebrand candidates. Days after Occupy Wall Street was evicted From Zuccotti Park last November he claimed the next phase of the Movement was “recruiting 2,000 candidates to run for office now under this 99% banner.” (More recently Jones says we should pitch talk of class war overboard because it is dragging down the movement. He claims, “The real enemy is not the 1 percent,”
    Well, there you go. This is really getting radical, ain't it?

    Referring to Mitt Romney as “Mr. 1%,” Ruben says, of the 2012 presidential contest, “There are real elections happening where people are choosing between candidates who want to cut taxes for billionaires and candidates who want billionaires to pay their fair share. And that’s a real choice.” Many occupiers beg to differ. Sure, plenty say they will hold their nose and vote for Obama, but few think it will make a real difference
    If you gonna vote for the sum bitch anyway, why would they give a shit what you think?

    Indignatos? Indignity means squat - "non-violent indignity" means even less. When you hear those capitalist fucks laughing, no need to wonder why...
    "The present status of society is but the result of the struggle of humankind during this and preceding periods - yes, struggle! "You cannot reform society by the sprinkling of rose oil" said Mirabeau, and history proves the correctness of this statement. In no age did the rulers and despoilers of our race relinquish their hold upon the throat of their victims, unless forced to - by logic and argument? No...Blood, the precious sap was ever the price of liberty." August Spies, 1886

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •