Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Deadly month in Iraq dulls US claims of progress

  1. #1

    Deadly month in Iraq dulls US claims of progress

    http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article....ticle_id=86454

    BAGHDAD: The number of Iraqis killed in insurgent and sectarian attacks rose in October, according to government figures obtained on Thursday, in a blow to a 9-month-old US troop-surge policy.

    At least 887 Iraqis were killed last month, compared to 840 in September, according to the data compiled by the Interior, Defense and Health ministries.

    As in previous months, the dead were overwhelmingly

    civilians, with 758 reported killed against 116 policemen and 13 soldiers.

    The October death toll remained sharply down on the August figure of 1,770 but the increase on September dented boasts from both US and Iraqi leaders that the crackdown on insurgent and militia violence was leading to a significant fall in casualties.

    Again on Thursday, Iraq's Security Minister, Shirwan al-Waili, insisted that the situation was improving in Baghdad and other areas.

    "Because of the security plan, the violence has decreased. Baghdad is much safer," Waili told state television.

    And just last week, the Iraqi Army commander for the Baghdad region, General Abud Qanbar, hailed what he said was mounting evidence of the success of Operation Fardh al-Qanoon (Imposing Law) launched in the capital and surrounding regions in February.

    The operation has seen the deployment of 28,500 additional US troops ordered to Iraq as part of President George W. Bush's "surge" policy.

    "The level of terrorist operations has decreased, and life has returned to normal in many parts of Baghdad," Qanbar told reporters on October 24.

    US second-in-command Lieutenant General Ray Odierno told the same news conference there was a "downward trend" in attacks.

  2. #2

    normalcy in Iraq

    flip chart analysis of death rates in Iraq to create american impression of "success" in Iraq. the squandering of our national resources in Iraq to obtain neo-colonial control of Iraqi oil assets is doomed to failure. the costs of finding replacement energy reserves for american multinational energy corporations cannot be escaped by conquest of Iraq and Iran. its a fairy tale, a pipe dream.

    the cost of replacement reserves for depleted oil resources for american multinationals exceeds the current cost of oil. the colonial formula of seizing readily accessible large fields in Iraq and Iran has already failed insofar as the costs have exploded and the ostensible benefits are not shown to be attainable in theory or in fact. history and modern arab regimes have long ago rejected the over-reaching predatory oil agreements envisaged for us multinationals in iraq and iran. american industrial elites have envisaged their undoing and are in dangerous denial.

    this is why bush had to repudiate our military defeat in Vietnam. Vietnam was the final repudiation of the colonial model of hegemonic rule, which the US has unsuccessfully tried to resurrect in asia.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •