Link to a Steve Freeman summary of the Mitofsky debate

[Melissa G]

http://www.democraticunderground.com...ess=203x397828

[rdmccur]

Heartening to see that Freeman decries the lack of data from Mitofsky to support his claims (as any good scientist knows is not science but 'science' in a guise of blind acceptance, e.g. Creationism).

[rdmccur]

a caveat to my last reply. There must be supporting data or at least a testable rigorous mathematical argument (or both).