View Full Version : HIGH TURNOUT AS TOWNS SEEK EXTRA BALLOTS
kliljedahl
01-08-2008, 02:39 PM
Posted: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 1:10 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: 2008, New Hampshire
From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
The New Hampshire Secretary of State's office is in the process of locating extra ballots to ship to towns that have expressed concern that supplies are running low. The concern is primarily on the Democratic side, officials say.
"The towns that are calling now are experiencing heavy turnout, and see their piles of ballots starting to drop at a rate faster than they're comfortable with," said Deputy Secretary of State Dave Scanlan. "They're also stating to us that it's the Democratic ballots that have them more concerned than the Republican ballots."
Scanlan said the office is in the process of locating overrun ballots, and will courier them to the towns that say they are running low.
Secretary of State Bill Gardner had predicted a turnout of 500,000, which would be a new record for the state. Scanlan said it's too soon to say if that target will be exceeded. "We're certainly encouraged, and if it goes beyond what the secretary predicted, that's great."
Scanlan said today is the warmest primary day he can remember. "Voters in New Hampshire typically turn out for elections, and the weather doesn't seem to bother them too much," he said. "Having nice weather today only helps."
At the polling location in Londonderry, more than 50 people were waiting outside for the doors to open at 7 am. Robert Saur, moderator pro-tem for the town, said he was expecting 70 percent turnout of the nearly 15,000 registered voters. "We're trying to keep everyone moving through here," he said.
Londonderry leans slightly Republican, with 5,641 registered Republicans and 3,620 registered Democrats. There are 6,105 registered undeclared voters who can vote in either primary. Early this morning, it was the blue, Democratic ballots that appeared to be most common.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/08/559115.aspx
kliljedahl
01-08-2008, 02:39 PM
Posted: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 1:10 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: 2008, New Hampshire
From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
The New Hampshire Secretary of State's office is in the process of locating extra ballots to ship to towns that have expressed concern that supplies are running low. The concern is primarily on the Democratic side, officials say.
"The towns that are calling now are experiencing heavy turnout, and see their piles of ballots starting to drop at a rate faster than they're comfortable with," said Deputy Secretary of State Dave Scanlan. "They're also stating to us that it's the Democratic ballots that have them more concerned than the Republican ballots."
Scanlan said the office is in the process of locating overrun ballots, and will courier them to the towns that say they are running low.
Secretary of State Bill Gardner had predicted a turnout of 500,000, which would be a new record for the state. Scanlan said it's too soon to say if that target will be exceeded. "We're certainly encouraged, and if it goes beyond what the secretary predicted, that's great."
Scanlan said today is the warmest primary day he can remember. "Voters in New Hampshire typically turn out for elections, and the weather doesn't seem to bother them too much," he said. "Having nice weather today only helps."
At the polling location in Londonderry, more than 50 people were waiting outside for the doors to open at 7 am. Robert Saur, moderator pro-tem for the town, said he was expecting 70 percent turnout of the nearly 15,000 registered voters. "We're trying to keep everyone moving through here," he said.
Londonderry leans slightly Republican, with 5,641 registered Republicans and 3,620 registered Democrats. There are 6,105 registered undeclared voters who can vote in either primary. Early this morning, it was the blue, Democratic ballots that appeared to be most common.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/08/559115.aspx
kliljedahl
01-08-2008, 02:39 PM
Posted: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 1:10 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: 2008, New Hampshire
From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
The New Hampshire Secretary of State's office is in the process of locating extra ballots to ship to towns that have expressed concern that supplies are running low. The concern is primarily on the Democratic side, officials say.
"The towns that are calling now are experiencing heavy turnout, and see their piles of ballots starting to drop at a rate faster than they're comfortable with," said Deputy Secretary of State Dave Scanlan. "They're also stating to us that it's the Democratic ballots that have them more concerned than the Republican ballots."
Scanlan said the office is in the process of locating overrun ballots, and will courier them to the towns that say they are running low.
Secretary of State Bill Gardner had predicted a turnout of 500,000, which would be a new record for the state. Scanlan said it's too soon to say if that target will be exceeded. "We're certainly encouraged, and if it goes beyond what the secretary predicted, that's great."
Scanlan said today is the warmest primary day he can remember. "Voters in New Hampshire typically turn out for elections, and the weather doesn't seem to bother them too much," he said. "Having nice weather today only helps."
At the polling location in Londonderry, more than 50 people were waiting outside for the doors to open at 7 am. Robert Saur, moderator pro-tem for the town, said he was expecting 70 percent turnout of the nearly 15,000 registered voters. "We're trying to keep everyone moving through here," he said.
Londonderry leans slightly Republican, with 5,641 registered Republicans and 3,620 registered Democrats. There are 6,105 registered undeclared voters who can vote in either primary. Early this morning, it was the blue, Democratic ballots that appeared to be most common.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/08/559115.aspx
kliljedahl
01-08-2008, 02:39 PM
Posted: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 1:10 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: 2008, New Hampshire
From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
The New Hampshire Secretary of State's office is in the process of locating extra ballots to ship to towns that have expressed concern that supplies are running low. The concern is primarily on the Democratic side, officials say.
"The towns that are calling now are experiencing heavy turnout, and see their piles of ballots starting to drop at a rate faster than they're comfortable with," said Deputy Secretary of State Dave Scanlan. "They're also stating to us that it's the Democratic ballots that have them more concerned than the Republican ballots."
Scanlan said the office is in the process of locating overrun ballots, and will courier them to the towns that say they are running low.
Secretary of State Bill Gardner had predicted a turnout of 500,000, which would be a new record for the state. Scanlan said it's too soon to say if that target will be exceeded. "We're certainly encouraged, and if it goes beyond what the secretary predicted, that's great."
Scanlan said today is the warmest primary day he can remember. "Voters in New Hampshire typically turn out for elections, and the weather doesn't seem to bother them too much," he said. "Having nice weather today only helps."
At the polling location in Londonderry, more than 50 people were waiting outside for the doors to open at 7 am. Robert Saur, moderator pro-tem for the town, said he was expecting 70 percent turnout of the nearly 15,000 registered voters. "We're trying to keep everyone moving through here," he said.
Londonderry leans slightly Republican, with 5,641 registered Republicans and 3,620 registered Democrats. There are 6,105 registered undeclared voters who can vote in either primary. Early this morning, it was the blue, Democratic ballots that appeared to be most common.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/08/559115.aspx
kliljedahl
01-08-2008, 02:39 PM
Posted: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 1:10 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: 2008, New Hampshire
From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
The New Hampshire Secretary of State's office is in the process of locating extra ballots to ship to towns that have expressed concern that supplies are running low. The concern is primarily on the Democratic side, officials say.
"The towns that are calling now are experiencing heavy turnout, and see their piles of ballots starting to drop at a rate faster than they're comfortable with," said Deputy Secretary of State Dave Scanlan. "They're also stating to us that it's the Democratic ballots that have them more concerned than the Republican ballots."
Scanlan said the office is in the process of locating overrun ballots, and will courier them to the towns that say they are running low.
Secretary of State Bill Gardner had predicted a turnout of 500,000, which would be a new record for the state. Scanlan said it's too soon to say if that target will be exceeded. "We're certainly encouraged, and if it goes beyond what the secretary predicted, that's great."
Scanlan said today is the warmest primary day he can remember. "Voters in New Hampshire typically turn out for elections, and the weather doesn't seem to bother them too much," he said. "Having nice weather today only helps."
At the polling location in Londonderry, more than 50 people were waiting outside for the doors to open at 7 am. Robert Saur, moderator pro-tem for the town, said he was expecting 70 percent turnout of the nearly 15,000 registered voters. "We're trying to keep everyone moving through here," he said.
Londonderry leans slightly Republican, with 5,641 registered Republicans and 3,620 registered Democrats. There are 6,105 registered undeclared voters who can vote in either primary. Early this morning, it was the blue, Democratic ballots that appeared to be most common.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/08/559115.aspx
kliljedahl
01-08-2008, 02:39 PM
Posted: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 1:10 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: 2008, New Hampshire
From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
The New Hampshire Secretary of State's office is in the process of locating extra ballots to ship to towns that have expressed concern that supplies are running low. The concern is primarily on the Democratic side, officials say.
"The towns that are calling now are experiencing heavy turnout, and see their piles of ballots starting to drop at a rate faster than they're comfortable with," said Deputy Secretary of State Dave Scanlan. "They're also stating to us that it's the Democratic ballots that have them more concerned than the Republican ballots."
Scanlan said the office is in the process of locating overrun ballots, and will courier them to the towns that say they are running low.
Secretary of State Bill Gardner had predicted a turnout of 500,000, which would be a new record for the state. Scanlan said it's too soon to say if that target will be exceeded. "We're certainly encouraged, and if it goes beyond what the secretary predicted, that's great."
Scanlan said today is the warmest primary day he can remember. "Voters in New Hampshire typically turn out for elections, and the weather doesn't seem to bother them too much," he said. "Having nice weather today only helps."
At the polling location in Londonderry, more than 50 people were waiting outside for the doors to open at 7 am. Robert Saur, moderator pro-tem for the town, said he was expecting 70 percent turnout of the nearly 15,000 registered voters. "We're trying to keep everyone moving through here," he said.
Londonderry leans slightly Republican, with 5,641 registered Republicans and 3,620 registered Democrats. There are 6,105 registered undeclared voters who can vote in either primary. Early this morning, it was the blue, Democratic ballots that appeared to be most common.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/08/559115.aspx
kliljedahl
01-08-2008, 02:39 PM
Posted: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 1:10 PM by Domenico Montanaro
Filed Under: 2008, New Hampshire
From NBC/NJ's Mike Memoli
The New Hampshire Secretary of State's office is in the process of locating extra ballots to ship to towns that have expressed concern that supplies are running low. The concern is primarily on the Democratic side, officials say.
"The towns that are calling now are experiencing heavy turnout, and see their piles of ballots starting to drop at a rate faster than they're comfortable with," said Deputy Secretary of State Dave Scanlan. "They're also stating to us that it's the Democratic ballots that have them more concerned than the Republican ballots."
Scanlan said the office is in the process of locating overrun ballots, and will courier them to the towns that say they are running low.
Secretary of State Bill Gardner had predicted a turnout of 500,000, which would be a new record for the state. Scanlan said it's too soon to say if that target will be exceeded. "We're certainly encouraged, and if it goes beyond what the secretary predicted, that's great."
Scanlan said today is the warmest primary day he can remember. "Voters in New Hampshire typically turn out for elections, and the weather doesn't seem to bother them too much," he said. "Having nice weather today only helps."
At the polling location in Londonderry, more than 50 people were waiting outside for the doors to open at 7 am. Robert Saur, moderator pro-tem for the town, said he was expecting 70 percent turnout of the nearly 15,000 registered voters. "We're trying to keep everyone moving through here," he said.
Londonderry leans slightly Republican, with 5,641 registered Republicans and 3,620 registered Democrats. There are 6,105 registered undeclared voters who can vote in either primary. Early this morning, it was the blue, Democratic ballots that appeared to be most common.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/08/559115.aspx
marshwren
01-08-2008, 02:44 PM
...and perhaps (much) less so for Edwards; but it may well be the second tolling of Hillary's death knell--in Iowa they showed her the cross; today in NH she's smelling the garlic; perhaps in SC they'll drive the wooden stake through her heart...hey, a boy can dream, can't he?
marshwren
01-08-2008, 02:44 PM
...and perhaps (much) less so for Edwards; but it may well be the second tolling of Hillary's death knell--in Iowa they showed her the cross; today in NH she's smelling the garlic; perhaps in SC they'll drive the wooden stake through her heart...hey, a boy can dream, can't he?
marshwren
01-08-2008, 02:44 PM
...and perhaps (much) less so for Edwards; but it may well be the second tolling of Hillary's death knell--in Iowa they showed her the cross; today in NH she's smelling the garlic; perhaps in SC they'll drive the wooden stake through her heart...hey, a boy can dream, can't he?
marshwren
01-08-2008, 02:44 PM
...and perhaps (much) less so for Edwards; but it may well be the second tolling of Hillary's death knell--in Iowa they showed her the cross; today in NH she's smelling the garlic; perhaps in SC they'll drive the wooden stake through her heart...hey, a boy can dream, can't he?
marshwren
01-08-2008, 02:44 PM
...and perhaps (much) less so for Edwards; but it may well be the second tolling of Hillary's death knell--in Iowa they showed her the cross; today in NH she's smelling the garlic; perhaps in SC they'll drive the wooden stake through her heart...hey, a boy can dream, can't he?
marshwren
01-08-2008, 02:44 PM
...and perhaps (much) less so for Edwards; but it may well be the second tolling of Hillary's death knell--in Iowa they showed her the cross; today in NH she's smelling the garlic; perhaps in SC they'll drive the wooden stake through her heart...hey, a boy can dream, can't he?
marshwren
01-08-2008, 02:44 PM
...and perhaps (much) less so for Edwards; but it may well be the second tolling of Hillary's death knell--in Iowa they showed her the cross; today in NH she's smelling the garlic; perhaps in SC they'll drive the wooden stake through her heart...hey, a boy can dream, can't he?
kliljedahl
01-09-2008, 06:02 AM
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e121/kliljedahl/MySpace%202/BILLARY.jpg
kliljedahl
01-09-2008, 06:02 AM
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e121/kliljedahl/MySpace%202/BILLARY.jpg
kliljedahl
01-09-2008, 06:02 AM
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e121/kliljedahl/MySpace%202/BILLARY.jpg
kliljedahl
01-09-2008, 06:02 AM
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e121/kliljedahl/MySpace%202/BILLARY.jpg
kliljedahl
01-09-2008, 06:02 AM
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e121/kliljedahl/MySpace%202/BILLARY.jpg
kliljedahl
01-09-2008, 06:02 AM
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e121/kliljedahl/MySpace%202/BILLARY.jpg
kliljedahl
01-09-2008, 06:02 AM
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e121/kliljedahl/MySpace%202/BILLARY.jpg
marshwren
01-09-2008, 01:15 PM
Hillary is the perfect candidate for the fear and smear campaign the GOP will, by necessity, be forced to run after the conventions (like they're going to run on Junior's eight years of uninterrupted peace and prosperity for all): 9/11 and Bubba's cock, 24/7 through election day. Not they'll really need to--the Dreaded She-Beast has the least appeal to non-declared (a more accurate term than 'independent') voters, who comprise the plurality of voters; she does well among Dims, but that's it. And running against her is about the only chance the GOP has: Obama's appeal beyond the Dim base is 'real' enough to make race-baiting very problematic for GOPs, and runs the huge risk of backfiring if too blatent (and what other way to GOPs know how to slime?). Edwards' economic populism (and evolving anti-war stand, however suspicious we may be of it) work to the Dims advantage against anyone except, perhaps Ron Paul (who isn't going to get the nomination under any circumstances--hey, Tin, if you're reading: you owe me a nickel--Paul got less than 10% in NH). So, in a very cynical sense, Hillary may be the best choice for the Dims--if they want to lose and have a major house-cleaning, by throwing the DLC'ers out (or being thrown out by them); either way, push will come to shove, and a new electorial alignment might be in the offing...and the same holds true in the worst-case scenario, a Hillary victory in November.
marshwren
01-09-2008, 01:15 PM
Hillary is the perfect candidate for the fear and smear campaign the GOP will, by necessity, be forced to run after the conventions (like they're going to run on Junior's eight years of uninterrupted peace and prosperity for all): 9/11 and Bubba's cock, 24/7 through election day. Not they'll really need to--the Dreaded She-Beast has the least appeal to non-declared (a more accurate term than 'independent') voters, who comprise the plurality of voters; she does well among Dims, but that's it. And running against her is about the only chance the GOP has: Obama's appeal beyond the Dim base is 'real' enough to make race-baiting very problematic for GOPs, and runs the huge risk of backfiring if too blatent (and what other way to GOPs know how to slime?). Edwards' economic populism (and evolving anti-war stand, however suspicious we may be of it) work to the Dims advantage against anyone except, perhaps Ron Paul (who isn't going to get the nomination under any circumstances--hey, Tin, if you're reading: you owe me a nickel--Paul got less than 10% in NH). So, in a very cynical sense, Hillary may be the best choice for the Dims--if they want to lose and have a major house-cleaning, by throwing the DLC'ers out (or being thrown out by them); either way, push will come to shove, and a new electorial alignment might be in the offing...and the same holds true in the worst-case scenario, a Hillary victory in November.
marshwren
01-09-2008, 01:15 PM
Hillary is the perfect candidate for the fear and smear campaign the GOP will, by necessity, be forced to run after the conventions (like they're going to run on Junior's eight years of uninterrupted peace and prosperity for all): 9/11 and Bubba's cock, 24/7 through election day. Not they'll really need to--the Dreaded She-Beast has the least appeal to non-declared (a more accurate term than 'independent') voters, who comprise the plurality of voters; she does well among Dims, but that's it. And running against her is about the only chance the GOP has: Obama's appeal beyond the Dim base is 'real' enough to make race-baiting very problematic for GOPs, and runs the huge risk of backfiring if too blatent (and what other way to GOPs know how to slime?). Edwards' economic populism (and evolving anti-war stand, however suspicious we may be of it) work to the Dims advantage against anyone except, perhaps Ron Paul (who isn't going to get the nomination under any circumstances--hey, Tin, if you're reading: you owe me a nickel--Paul got less than 10% in NH). So, in a very cynical sense, Hillary may be the best choice for the Dims--if they want to lose and have a major house-cleaning, by throwing the DLC'ers out (or being thrown out by them); either way, push will come to shove, and a new electorial alignment might be in the offing...and the same holds true in the worst-case scenario, a Hillary victory in November.
marshwren
01-09-2008, 01:15 PM
Hillary is the perfect candidate for the fear and smear campaign the GOP will, by necessity, be forced to run after the conventions (like they're going to run on Junior's eight years of uninterrupted peace and prosperity for all): 9/11 and Bubba's cock, 24/7 through election day. Not they'll really need to--the Dreaded She-Beast has the least appeal to non-declared (a more accurate term than 'independent') voters, who comprise the plurality of voters; she does well among Dims, but that's it. And running against her is about the only chance the GOP has: Obama's appeal beyond the Dim base is 'real' enough to make race-baiting very problematic for GOPs, and runs the huge risk of backfiring if too blatent (and what other way to GOPs know how to slime?). Edwards' economic populism (and evolving anti-war stand, however suspicious we may be of it) work to the Dims advantage against anyone except, perhaps Ron Paul (who isn't going to get the nomination under any circumstances--hey, Tin, if you're reading: you owe me a nickel--Paul got less than 10% in NH). So, in a very cynical sense, Hillary may be the best choice for the Dims--if they want to lose and have a major house-cleaning, by throwing the DLC'ers out (or being thrown out by them); either way, push will come to shove, and a new electorial alignment might be in the offing...and the same holds true in the worst-case scenario, a Hillary victory in November.
marshwren
01-09-2008, 01:15 PM
Hillary is the perfect candidate for the fear and smear campaign the GOP will, by necessity, be forced to run after the conventions (like they're going to run on Junior's eight years of uninterrupted peace and prosperity for all): 9/11 and Bubba's cock, 24/7 through election day. Not they'll really need to--the Dreaded She-Beast has the least appeal to non-declared (a more accurate term than 'independent') voters, who comprise the plurality of voters; she does well among Dims, but that's it. And running against her is about the only chance the GOP has: Obama's appeal beyond the Dim base is 'real' enough to make race-baiting very problematic for GOPs, and runs the huge risk of backfiring if too blatent (and what other way to GOPs know how to slime?). Edwards' economic populism (and evolving anti-war stand, however suspicious we may be of it) work to the Dims advantage against anyone except, perhaps Ron Paul (who isn't going to get the nomination under any circumstances--hey, Tin, if you're reading: you owe me a nickel--Paul got less than 10% in NH). So, in a very cynical sense, Hillary may be the best choice for the Dims--if they want to lose and have a major house-cleaning, by throwing the DLC'ers out (or being thrown out by them); either way, push will come to shove, and a new electorial alignment might be in the offing...and the same holds true in the worst-case scenario, a Hillary victory in November.
marshwren
01-09-2008, 01:15 PM
Hillary is the perfect candidate for the fear and smear campaign the GOP will, by necessity, be forced to run after the conventions (like they're going to run on Junior's eight years of uninterrupted peace and prosperity for all): 9/11 and Bubba's cock, 24/7 through election day. Not they'll really need to--the Dreaded She-Beast has the least appeal to non-declared (a more accurate term than 'independent') voters, who comprise the plurality of voters; she does well among Dims, but that's it. And running against her is about the only chance the GOP has: Obama's appeal beyond the Dim base is 'real' enough to make race-baiting very problematic for GOPs, and runs the huge risk of backfiring if too blatent (and what other way to GOPs know how to slime?). Edwards' economic populism (and evolving anti-war stand, however suspicious we may be of it) work to the Dims advantage against anyone except, perhaps Ron Paul (who isn't going to get the nomination under any circumstances--hey, Tin, if you're reading: you owe me a nickel--Paul got less than 10% in NH). So, in a very cynical sense, Hillary may be the best choice for the Dims--if they want to lose and have a major house-cleaning, by throwing the DLC'ers out (or being thrown out by them); either way, push will come to shove, and a new electorial alignment might be in the offing...and the same holds true in the worst-case scenario, a Hillary victory in November.
marshwren
01-09-2008, 01:15 PM
Hillary is the perfect candidate for the fear and smear campaign the GOP will, by necessity, be forced to run after the conventions (like they're going to run on Junior's eight years of uninterrupted peace and prosperity for all): 9/11 and Bubba's cock, 24/7 through election day. Not they'll really need to--the Dreaded She-Beast has the least appeal to non-declared (a more accurate term than 'independent') voters, who comprise the plurality of voters; she does well among Dims, but that's it. And running against her is about the only chance the GOP has: Obama's appeal beyond the Dim base is 'real' enough to make race-baiting very problematic for GOPs, and runs the huge risk of backfiring if too blatent (and what other way to GOPs know how to slime?). Edwards' economic populism (and evolving anti-war stand, however suspicious we may be of it) work to the Dims advantage against anyone except, perhaps Ron Paul (who isn't going to get the nomination under any circumstances--hey, Tin, if you're reading: you owe me a nickel--Paul got less than 10% in NH). So, in a very cynical sense, Hillary may be the best choice for the Dims--if they want to lose and have a major house-cleaning, by throwing the DLC'ers out (or being thrown out by them); either way, push will come to shove, and a new electorial alignment might be in the offing...and the same holds true in the worst-case scenario, a Hillary victory in November.
Virgil
01-09-2008, 02:16 PM
http://www.freerepublic.com/images/freepathon/bill_and_hillary_clinton-vi.jpg
Virgil
01-09-2008, 02:16 PM
http://www.freerepublic.com/images/freepathon/bill_and_hillary_clinton-vi.jpg
Virgil
01-09-2008, 02:16 PM
http://www.freerepublic.com/images/freepathon/bill_and_hillary_clinton-vi.jpg
Virgil
01-09-2008, 02:16 PM
http://www.freerepublic.com/images/freepathon/bill_and_hillary_clinton-vi.jpg
Virgil
01-09-2008, 02:16 PM
http://www.freerepublic.com/images/freepathon/bill_and_hillary_clinton-vi.jpg
Virgil
01-09-2008, 02:16 PM
http://www.freerepublic.com/images/freepathon/bill_and_hillary_clinton-vi.jpg
Virgil
01-09-2008, 02:16 PM
http://www.freerepublic.com/images/freepathon/bill_and_hillary_clinton-vi.jpg
Tinoire
01-09-2008, 02:21 PM
How about one of the new ones? That'll give me time to scrape together enough few pennies to make up a nickel ;)
A democrat is supposed to win this election- PNAC promised it to them which is why you see both Hillary and Obama flanked by so many neocons and neolibs. Edwards is in some weird Bilderberg pseudo-populist boat that's just there for show.
I was very surprised. I think Obama has this one in the bag but that's without factoring in the Clinton's ruthlessness. There's not a dirty trick in the book I put beneath them.
6 of one, half dozen of the other. What an appalling election.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/image/2005_nickel.jpg
Face Forward Nickel
Like the penny, the nickel is costing more to produce than it is worth. The nickel has gone through a number of design changes with the most recent one this year. The new nickel features Thomas Jefferson facing forward.
Cost to Produce: Last year, it cost 4.83 cents to produce the nickel, but the U.S. Mint is estimating that it will cost 5.73 cents by the end of fiscal year 2006.
Composition: Cupro-Nickel (25% nickel, balance copper)
Number Produced: 1.7 billion nickels
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/source/3.htm
Tinoire
01-09-2008, 02:21 PM
How about one of the new ones? That'll give me time to scrape together enough few pennies to make up a nickel ;)
A democrat is supposed to win this election- PNAC promised it to them which is why you see both Hillary and Obama flanked by so many neocons and neolibs. Edwards is in some weird Bilderberg pseudo-populist boat that's just there for show.
I was very surprised. I think Obama has this one in the bag but that's without factoring in the Clinton's ruthlessness. There's not a dirty trick in the book I put beneath them.
6 of one, half dozen of the other. What an appalling election.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/image/2005_nickel.jpg
Face Forward Nickel
Like the penny, the nickel is costing more to produce than it is worth. The nickel has gone through a number of design changes with the most recent one this year. The new nickel features Thomas Jefferson facing forward.
Cost to Produce: Last year, it cost 4.83 cents to produce the nickel, but the U.S. Mint is estimating that it will cost 5.73 cents by the end of fiscal year 2006.
Composition: Cupro-Nickel (25% nickel, balance copper)
Number Produced: 1.7 billion nickels
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/source/3.htm
Tinoire
01-09-2008, 02:21 PM
How about one of the new ones? That'll give me time to scrape together enough few pennies to make up a nickel ;)
A democrat is supposed to win this election- PNAC promised it to them which is why you see both Hillary and Obama flanked by so many neocons and neolibs. Edwards is in some weird Bilderberg pseudo-populist boat that's just there for show.
I was very surprised. I think Obama has this one in the bag but that's without factoring in the Clinton's ruthlessness. There's not a dirty trick in the book I put beneath them.
6 of one, half dozen of the other. What an appalling election.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/image/2005_nickel.jpg
Face Forward Nickel
Like the penny, the nickel is costing more to produce than it is worth. The nickel has gone through a number of design changes with the most recent one this year. The new nickel features Thomas Jefferson facing forward.
Cost to Produce: Last year, it cost 4.83 cents to produce the nickel, but the U.S. Mint is estimating that it will cost 5.73 cents by the end of fiscal year 2006.
Composition: Cupro-Nickel (25% nickel, balance copper)
Number Produced: 1.7 billion nickels
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/source/3.htm
Tinoire
01-09-2008, 02:21 PM
How about one of the new ones? That'll give me time to scrape together enough few pennies to make up a nickel ;)
A democrat is supposed to win this election- PNAC promised it to them which is why you see both Hillary and Obama flanked by so many neocons and neolibs. Edwards is in some weird Bilderberg pseudo-populist boat that's just there for show.
I was very surprised. I think Obama has this one in the bag but that's without factoring in the Clinton's ruthlessness. There's not a dirty trick in the book I put beneath them.
6 of one, half dozen of the other. What an appalling election.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/image/2005_nickel.jpg
Face Forward Nickel
Like the penny, the nickel is costing more to produce than it is worth. The nickel has gone through a number of design changes with the most recent one this year. The new nickel features Thomas Jefferson facing forward.
Cost to Produce: Last year, it cost 4.83 cents to produce the nickel, but the U.S. Mint is estimating that it will cost 5.73 cents by the end of fiscal year 2006.
Composition: Cupro-Nickel (25% nickel, balance copper)
Number Produced: 1.7 billion nickels
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/source/3.htm
Tinoire
01-09-2008, 02:21 PM
How about one of the new ones? That'll give me time to scrape together enough few pennies to make up a nickel ;)
A democrat is supposed to win this election- PNAC promised it to them which is why you see both Hillary and Obama flanked by so many neocons and neolibs. Edwards is in some weird Bilderberg pseudo-populist boat that's just there for show.
I was very surprised. I think Obama has this one in the bag but that's without factoring in the Clinton's ruthlessness. There's not a dirty trick in the book I put beneath them.
6 of one, half dozen of the other. What an appalling election.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/image/2005_nickel.jpg
Face Forward Nickel
Like the penny, the nickel is costing more to produce than it is worth. The nickel has gone through a number of design changes with the most recent one this year. The new nickel features Thomas Jefferson facing forward.
Cost to Produce: Last year, it cost 4.83 cents to produce the nickel, but the U.S. Mint is estimating that it will cost 5.73 cents by the end of fiscal year 2006.
Composition: Cupro-Nickel (25% nickel, balance copper)
Number Produced: 1.7 billion nickels
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/source/3.htm
Tinoire
01-09-2008, 02:21 PM
How about one of the new ones? That'll give me time to scrape together enough few pennies to make up a nickel ;)
A democrat is supposed to win this election- PNAC promised it to them which is why you see both Hillary and Obama flanked by so many neocons and neolibs. Edwards is in some weird Bilderberg pseudo-populist boat that's just there for show.
I was very surprised. I think Obama has this one in the bag but that's without factoring in the Clinton's ruthlessness. There's not a dirty trick in the book I put beneath them.
6 of one, half dozen of the other. What an appalling election.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/image/2005_nickel.jpg
Face Forward Nickel
Like the penny, the nickel is costing more to produce than it is worth. The nickel has gone through a number of design changes with the most recent one this year. The new nickel features Thomas Jefferson facing forward.
Cost to Produce: Last year, it cost 4.83 cents to produce the nickel, but the U.S. Mint is estimating that it will cost 5.73 cents by the end of fiscal year 2006.
Composition: Cupro-Nickel (25% nickel, balance copper)
Number Produced: 1.7 billion nickels
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/source/3.htm
Tinoire
01-09-2008, 02:21 PM
How about one of the new ones? That'll give me time to scrape together enough few pennies to make up a nickel ;)
A democrat is supposed to win this election- PNAC promised it to them which is why you see both Hillary and Obama flanked by so many neocons and neolibs. Edwards is in some weird Bilderberg pseudo-populist boat that's just there for show.
I was very surprised. I think Obama has this one in the bag but that's without factoring in the Clinton's ruthlessness. There's not a dirty trick in the book I put beneath them.
6 of one, half dozen of the other. What an appalling election.
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/image/2005_nickel.jpg
Face Forward Nickel
Like the penny, the nickel is costing more to produce than it is worth. The nickel has gone through a number of design changes with the most recent one this year. The new nickel features Thomas Jefferson facing forward.
Cost to Produce: Last year, it cost 4.83 cents to produce the nickel, but the U.S. Mint is estimating that it will cost 5.73 cents by the end of fiscal year 2006.
Composition: Cupro-Nickel (25% nickel, balance copper)
Number Produced: 1.7 billion nickels
http://images.businessweek.com/ss/06/07/money/source/3.htm
sweetheart
01-09-2008, 02:28 PM
http://image.guim.co.uk/Guardian/world/gallery/2008/jan/09/1/GD5801902@epa01216866-I0013-5023.jpg
We all know monkey business is involved.
sweetheart
01-09-2008, 02:28 PM
http://image.guim.co.uk/Guardian/world/gallery/2008/jan/09/1/GD5801902@epa01216866-I0013-5023.jpg
We all know monkey business is involved.
sweetheart
01-09-2008, 02:28 PM
http://image.guim.co.uk/Guardian/world/gallery/2008/jan/09/1/GD5801902@epa01216866-I0013-5023.jpg
We all know monkey business is involved.
sweetheart
01-09-2008, 02:28 PM
http://image.guim.co.uk/Guardian/world/gallery/2008/jan/09/1/GD5801902@epa01216866-I0013-5023.jpg
We all know monkey business is involved.
sweetheart
01-09-2008, 02:28 PM
http://image.guim.co.uk/Guardian/world/gallery/2008/jan/09/1/GD5801902@epa01216866-I0013-5023.jpg
We all know monkey business is involved.
sweetheart
01-09-2008, 02:28 PM
http://image.guim.co.uk/Guardian/world/gallery/2008/jan/09/1/GD5801902@epa01216866-I0013-5023.jpg
We all know monkey business is involved.
sweetheart
01-09-2008, 02:28 PM
http://image.guim.co.uk/Guardian/world/gallery/2008/jan/09/1/GD5801902@epa01216866-I0013-5023.jpg
We all know monkey business is involved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.