PDA

View Full Version : Obama's Change Leaves by the Back Door



Montag
11-08-2008, 02:31 PM
Obama's Change Leaves By The Back Door
By Tom Eley

07 November, 2008
http://www.countercurrents.org/eley071108.htm

excerpt:

Three days after Barack Obama's election victory, the initial moves by the president-elect to prepare his administration already show that his policies will be determined not by popular expectations, but by the domestic and foreign policy interests of the American financial and corporate elite.

Obama and Democratic congressional leaders are well aware that these policies—further measures to secure the social interests and personal wealth of the financial aristocracy at public expense and the continued use of military violence in the Middle East and Central Asia—clash with the will of the electorate, which sought to reverse these policies by sweeping the Republicans out of power. That is why the Democrats are seeking to dampen expectations of a serious change of course.

The personnel of Obama's transition team and his first major appointment stand in obvious contradiction to his campaign rhetoric about "change," "new politics," and "building a movement from the ground up." The individuals selected are all fixtures of the political establishment, with close ties to powerful corporate and financial interests.

Obama's transition team, which will assist in assembling his cabinet, is headed by John Podesta, former chief of staff to Bill Clinton and one of Washington's most successful corporate lobbyists. Co-chairing the transition team are Valerie Jarrett, a long-time Obama advisor, Chicago real estate executive and influential figure within the Chicago Democratic Party machine, and Pete Rouse, a Washington insider and Obama's senate chief of staff. (See: "A closer look at Obama's transition team").

Obama's first appointee is Rahm Emanuel, who will serve as his chief of staff. The Illinois Congressman is a leading member of the right-wing Democratic Leadership Council. While running for Congress in 2002, he supported Bush's bill to authorize military force against Iraq. A former investment banker, he has close ties to financial interests and is one of the biggest recipients of campaign cash from banks and investment firms.

Sources close to Obama have leaked names on the list of candidates for the position of treasury secretary—no doubt as a means of reassuring Wall Street. Included are former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, former Clinton treasury secretary and current Citigroup executive Robert Rubin, another former Clinton treasury secretary, Lawrence Summers, and Timothy Geithner, the New York Federal Reserve Bank president.

All of these individuals played leading roles in the deregulation of the banks and investment houses that facilitated the super-profits and massive CEO compensation packages of the 1990s and first half of the current decade, and contributed to the financial collapse that is now plunging the US and the rest of the world into the deepest recession since the 1930s.

Geithner has played a central role in the government bailout of Wall Street banks and other major firms, such as insurance conglomerate AIG and the mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

As Federal Reserve chief under Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, Volcker was responsible for the high interest rate "shock therapy" which decimated American industry in the early 1980s and led to the impoverishment of entire regions.

There is much speculation that Obama will ask current Defense Secretary Robert Gates to stay on in the same capacity, at least on an interim basis. Gates recently gave a speech expanding the doctrine of "pre-emptive war" to include the use of first-strike nuclear attacks.

Other names broached for the positions of defense secretary and secretary of state include former Bush Secretary of State Colin Powell, outgoing Republican Senator Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, and Anthony Lake, who as Clinton's national security advisor played a key role in organizing the US-NATO war against Yugoslavia.

Greta
11-08-2008, 03:45 PM
You can be expected to take orders. Change back to Clinton's type of people is what Mr. Soros wanted but he knew that the republicans would come out in force to vote against Hillary so the next best option was to get out an overwhelming black vote. Worked like a charm, Oprah was played like a fiddle. He even had The Messiah come out against "gay marriage" to seal the deal with those who are squeamish about homosexuals.

Obama is but the DLC in black face singin' mammy to the tune of the puppet masters.

Montag
11-08-2008, 03:55 PM
Good comment Greta,
Welcome to PI!

sweetheart
11-08-2008, 05:50 PM
In 1997, there was a wave of sincere possibility that new labour was not claptrap,
but a system of social reformation based on marketising previously public markets
(privatisation). And by selling off the poorly managed fat, the hope was some new
technology, maybe even a fast train or two like france and germany have... heck,
maybe with even more possibilities in a synergy of wealth with the USA who seems
(its 1997 mind) to have it sorted for a permanent growth economy.

Tony let us down. He walked from his catholic marxist lie perpetually towards his tory
ideal. He made no economy except war side-kick to the big lie. And all of the UK is
powered by the robber barons of the city of london pirate free port... oh, thou shalt
not regulate finance - or we have no economy say'est the lord.

Obama will fix it. Pound 1:1 at the dollar - cheap travel in the UK for yanks,
time for the lower classes to come cross the pond and toss a stone at the assholes who've
supported class repression against them for centuries.

Oh, pining for an assassin, an anarchist, something archduke kennedy...
Thou rightest opponent battle plans in barns...

DirkDiscordia
11-09-2008, 12:11 PM
This election served, as usual, to underscore the illusion that the population has a real choice and that that choice will effect a major change in ways that will benefit them on the lower-end of the political food chain.

So, in that case, the s-election was another big success. In fact, the Obama card, for several, obvious reasons, was more like Academy Award class showmanship for the masses. Great movie! The World watched this flick and the plot took them in, as well. Bravo!

Now, citizens, (consumers) and pundits will compare and react to what has been placed before them in ways that are largly accounted for so that the real agendas can continue for the benefit of those who forge them.

If a large segment of the populace, (and the World?) could step out of the cinema long enough to understand the script, plot, and actors behind the fictive work we are calling real politics, then something wonderful might actually happen for a, (real) change.

There are many people waking-up, but they still stand as a minority and that means the majority of political move-goers continues to vote for, and believe in, sequels to the same story. Of course, the theme of this series is manipulation and exploitation of the hopeful protagonists who participate sincerely and with exuberance only to find themselves in increasingly dire and diminished circumstances at the end of each installment.

The plot thickens, but we can't even make soup with that.

Virgil
11-09-2008, 12:56 PM
I thought about the best link I could produce in comment to the election and decided on this link to a Chomsky work.


In Others' Words: On the vacuous slogans of Obombem's "Change"
http://www.scribd.com/doc/89575/Noam-Chomsky-The-Spectacular-Achievements-Of-Propaganda

sweetheart
11-09-2008, 07:32 PM
5:40
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbUtL_0vAJk

Virgil
11-09-2008, 08:01 PM
Money leadership kind of wiped out the moral leadership, I guess. I wouldn't even know who to nominate for the greatest moral leader of today. It could be it is not highly sought as the title award could be a bullet to the head.

Now that is what I call a speech. I am pretty sure a powerful speech has to say something powerful. Speeches have been powered down and this grading on the curve lets a flunking speech pass. This demonstrates what I say about there is nothing going to change because people do not have a song that cannot be contained. Here we see a song that cannot be contained.

You cannot be an army for change without a flag.
http://a810.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/00015/90/89/15119809_s.gif
I am Canabian

=============================
Part 2


I wrote a song one night about 15 years ago- Die you bastard die.

Pretty good words too.

Die you bastard die.
Die you bastard die.
Make the world a better place.
Die you bastard die.

It just could not be contained.

Confederate Anthem
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-iaqQ-mryg

I am a rebel soldier
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa8GIVblH_I

The Confederate Soldier ~ song "Johnny Reb"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJD0Eall4Dw

Genius
11-09-2008, 11:31 PM
Google Paul Adolph Volcker. He's worth checking out. He's not someone who will be on our side.

You might want to read this article:
http://circleof13.blogspot.com/2008/06/air-force-purge-shows-brzezinskis-tlc.html