Republicans clear way for minimum-wage rise

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

Dems in the Senate working for their peeps

Jan 30, 2007 — WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic campaign promise to boost the federal minimum wage for the first time in a decade moved closer to completion on Tuesday when U.S. Senate Republicans lifted a roadblock against it.

Full Senate approval is now possible because Democrats agreed to Republican demands to include tax cuts for small businesses to help cover the cost of raising the minimum wage over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15 per hour.

On an 87-10 vote, the Democratic-led Senate agreed to ... provide about $8.3 billion in tax breaks.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2835201

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[illiteratepresident]

and direct responsibility to their disctrict constituencies in a participatory democracy.

I rather be mugged in Caracas an active in running the country than put up with this BULLSHIT Fascism under the guise of democracy.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[andrew]

has the power to take away more of our liberties. even more scary, is that the masses will often support this.

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[illiteratepresident]

a legislature without continuing and direct ties to active participants organized down to the community level.

I am not talking about a unicameral legislature that is a bunch of removed millionaires like our current duopoly...

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[andrew]

are progressive. there are a lot of christian coalition types who are quite skilled at organizing.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.

[illiteratepresident]

but the idea that we should support the current system in any form is repellent to me, far more repellent than the notion that some of the citizen participants around me may have ideas I disagree with.